Examples of acute health effects include stinging eyes, rashes, blisters, blindness, nausea, dizziness, diarrhea and death. Examples of known chronic effects are cancers , birth defects, reproductive harm , immunotoxicity , neurological and developmental toxicity, and disruption of the endocrine system.
Some people are more vulnerable than others to pesticide impacts. For example, infants and young children are known to be more susceptible than adults to the toxic effects of pesticides.
Farm workers and pesticide applicators are also more vulnerable because they receive greater exposures. Immediate health effects from pesticide exposure includes irritation of the nose, throat, and skin causing burning, stinging and itching as well as rashes and blisters.
Nausea, dizziness and diarrhea are also common. In many cases, symptoms of pesticide poisoning mimic symptoms of colds or the flu. Since pesticide-related illnesses appear similar or identical to other illnesses, pesticide poisonings are often misdiagnosed and under-reported.
Immediate symptoms may not be severe enough to prompt an individual to seek medical attention, or a doctor might not even think to ask about pesticide exposure. Glyphosate use has increased dramatically in the past 20 years due to its frequent use in Roundup Ready crops corn, soybean, cotton.
Consequently, the likelihood of glyphosate exposure has increased for pesticide applicators. However, the EPA has concluded that there is low potential for the general public or non-applicators to be exposed to a recurring biologically relevant dose of glyphosate based on models of glyphosate persistence in the environment and dietary exposure.
The chemical properties of glyphosate generally minimize off-target movement and promote dissipation in the environment. Glyphosate is degraded in soil and water by microbes and binds tightly to soil particles, which prevents leaching of glyphosate into ground water.
Glyphosate does not degrade quickly in plants. As a result, it is possible that glyphosate residues can occur in food products. However, glyphosate is generally not applied to crops that are produced for direct human consumption. The vast majority of glyphosate is applied to fallow fields or in crops that are used for animal feed corn, soybean , energy corn or fiber cotton and is applied early in the growing season to young vegetative crops many weeks before plants produce grain or are harvested.
The herbicide registration process requires EPA review of over studies that focus on herbicide toxicological properties, environmental fate and the potential for non-target effects. These studies are used to conduct formal risk assessments that quantify the likelihood of adverse effects to humans using toxicological data and models of exposure.
The Food Quality Protection Act FQPA, passed in requires a " reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure " to pesticides and establishes enforceable residue standards based on models of food consumption.
Several organizations have evaluated cancer risks associated with glyphosate in recent years. These assessments consider epidemiological, toxicology and genotoxicity studies.
Sign in. Thanks for reading Scientific American. Create your free account or Sign in to continue. See Subscription Options. Go Paperless with Digital.
Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter. Sign Up. Support science journalism. Knowledge awaits. See Subscription Options Already a subscriber? Create Account See Subscription Options. Continue reading with a Scientific American subscription. Choosing the appropriate herbicide depends upon target species biology, herbicide selectivity, application method, and site conditions.
It is important to understand these factors to ensure that an effective herbicide is selected. For example, contact herbicides are most effective against annual invasive plants and in situations in which plant regrowth is not a concern. Conversely, systemic herbicides are more effective on perennial invasive plants and can limit regeneration of treated plants.
Soil-applied herbicides are most effective on seedlings or germinating plants prior to their emergence above the soil. Established plants may require a foliar-applied herbicide for effective control.
Mature plant tissues absorb herbicides less easily than young plant tissues due to thickening of the outer tissues in older plants. Systemic herbicides move, or translocate, from the point of application to the site of action through either the phloem tissue that transports sugars from the leaves to the roots , xylem tissue that transports water from the roots to the leaves , or through both.
Some herbicides move more easily and farther within plants than others. To be effective, an herbicide must reach the site of action. An herbicide binds to a specific location within the plant, typically a single protein, and as a result disrupts a physiological process essential for normal plant growth and development. Herbicides can affect various sites of action within plants, and they are often categorized into different mechanisms of action based on how they work and the injury symptoms they produce.
Repeated use of an herbicide with the same mechanism of action can result in resistance of the plant population to that herbicide because selection pressure for the resistant portions of the population increases with each application. Using herbicides with different mechanisms of action, or combining them with other control methods, can reduce the risk of developing herbicide-resistant populations.
Because herbicides are inherently toxic to plants, they are effective tools to manage undesirable plant species, but they can also have unintended, adverse effects on desirable plant species. Thus, it is important to understand the fundamentals of how herbicides affect plants as well as to focus herbicide use to meet particular invasive plant management objectives.
Plants vary in their susceptibility to different herbicides. For example, the selective herbicide 2,4-D injures or kills broadleaved plants but has little effect on grasses. Selectivity is the result of complex interactions between the plant, the herbicide, and the environment.
Because of herbicide selectivity, continued use of a particular herbicide may result in a shift within a plant community from susceptible to more herbicide-tolerant species. For example, repeated use of herbicides, such as clopyralid, that select for broadleaved species can result in an increase in grasses Tyser et al.
Removal of invasive plants from highly degraded sites can result in one undesirable species being replaced by an equally undesirable species. In these cases, revegetation with desirable and competitive plant species is often necessary DiTomaso If viable seeds remain in the soil after treatment, undesirable plants can reestablish. The relative importance of the seedbank to seedling recruitment and subsequent increase in an invasive plant population varies with the species as well as the plant community and site conditions.
Depending upon the plant species, seeds can remain viable in the soil for many years. Thus, management must account for the potential of plant populations to persist even after multiple herbicide treatments. Some herbicides such as picloram can be persistent in the soil for several years after application and can control new plants germinating from seedbanks Tu et al. Federal laws and policies regulate many aspects of herbicides including labeling, registration, and application, but these regulations are not a substitute for a thorough knowledge of the risks associated with herbicide use.
The benefits of herbicides must be weighed against the potential for exposure and impacts to human health, nontarget organisms, and the environment. Risks are always present with any herbicide use, but improper use or misapplication can increase these risks.
The federal government, in cooperation with individual states, regulates herbicides to ensure that they do not pose unreasonable risks to human health or the environment. The EPA requires extensive test data from herbicide producers to show that products can be used without harming human health and the environment.
EPA scientists and analysts carefully review these data to determine whether to register license an herbicide product and whether specific restrictions are necessary. The process of registering an herbicide is a scientific, legal, and administrative procedure through which the EPA examines ingredients of the herbicide; sites or target species on which it is to be used; amount, frequency, and timing of its use; and storage and disposal practices.
In evaluating an herbicide registration application, the EPA assesses a wide variety of potential human health and environmental effects associated with use of the product. The producer of the herbicide must provide data that address the following:.
0コメント