Most disbursements are measured in terms of money given, such as how many dollars were donated or how many low-interest loans were extended. Many foreign-aid bureaucracies define success on the basis of nominal monetary disbursements.
Critics counter that dollars of funding do not always translate to effective assistance, so measuring simply in money terms is insufficient. Foreign-aid disbursements face many hurdles, including local corruption and alternative domestic agendas. A report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute found that billions in aid to Afghanistan had been wasted or stolen by "kleptocrats," who used the money to suppress entrepreneurs and even to purchase expensive villas.
Bilateral aid is the dominant type of state-run aid. Bilateral aid occurs when one government directly transfers money or other assets to a recipient country. On the surface, American bilateral aid programs are designed to spread economic growth, development and democracy. In reality, many are given strategically as diplomatic tools or handsome contracts to well-connected businesses. Most problematic bilateral aid disbursements are simple, direct cash transfers.
Foreign governments are often corrupt and use foreign aid money to bolster their military control or to create propaganda-style education programs. Military aid can be considered a type of bilateral aid, with one twist. It normally requires one nation to either purchase arms or sign defense contracts directly with the United States. In some cases, the federal government purchases the arms and uses the military to transport them to the recipient country. The country that receives the most military aid from the United States, and the most aid in general, is Israel.
Multilateral aid is like bilateral aid, except it is provided by many governments instead of one. A single international organization, such as the World Bank, often pools funds from various contributing nations and executes the delivery of the aid. Multilateral assistance is a small part of the U. Agency for International Development's foreign aid programs. Governments might shy away from multilateral aid because it is more challenging to make strategic decisions when several other donors are involved.
Humanitarian assistance can be thought of as a targeted and shorter-term version of bilateral aid. For example, humanitarian aid from wealthy nations poured into the coastal regions in South Asia after a 9.
Because it tends to be higher-profile than other types of aid, humanitarian efforts receive more private funding than most other types of aid. Congressional Research Service. Programs and Policy ," Page 1. Accessed Aug. The World Bank. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
Heritage Foundation. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Foreign Aid to Israel ," Page 2. Behavioral Economics. Wealth Management. These helped relaunch global aid, which concentrated on social and especially medical objectives.
Today, it is the 17 Sustainable Development Goals SDGs , adopted in , that form both the framework for political, economic, social, and environmental policies of all countries and the new framework of intervention for international aid. All the financial tools have a role in the SDGs. We can find such successes locally, of course, but also on a larger scale. Conversely, the absence of aid can have severe repercussions. A striking example of the usefulness of ODA concerns the Sahel.
French ODA had been very rooted there historically and played a strong stabilizing role. The collapse of French aid in this zone between and left the coast clear for all sorts of trafficking and influences. The result is that, in 15 years, Jihadism has turned it into one of its major zones of influence. Countries all over the world have seen their overall level of development increase or even explode.
Even the countries that remain the poorest, such as those in Africa, have in many cases made huge progress in the last 40 years. For example, there have been no major famines linked to natural causes in West Africa since the beginning of the s, despite the fact that the population has increased threefold. To what extent can we attribute these successes to ODA? Yet, this construction is essential. In some countries, significant reforms in governance seem required to enable sufficient economic and social development.
The effectiveness of programs is nonetheless a constant concern of all the actors involved. To measure it, the donor countries that are members of the Development Assistance Committee of the OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development regularly carry out evaluation of their actions. This form of audit is based on a detailed examination of aid machinery, combined with field visits.
Analyses and recommendations then follow. These 17 objectives, to be reached by , cover all the major issues facing humanity and sketch out a world that is simultaneously fair, prosperous, and sustainable. This means that they are valid as much for the United States as for Peru or Chad. This vision of the direction to take for the next 15 years, shared by the entire planet, requires mobilization by all: the international community, States, NGOs, local authorities, businesses, and citizens.
The fight against poverty and hunger remain crucial concerns, as do access to water, health care, education, and gender equality. Today, some SDGs seem attainable, such as the elimination of extreme poverty. But others call for very significant efforts on the part of the international community, in particular the fight against climate change and the preservation of oceans. There are very many official development assistance actors: international institutions, States, local authorities, and development agencies and banks.
Through loans at favorable rates, these banks meet needs that are too risky or too big for private banks. Development banks are secured to States and have the capacity to plan in the long term.
They are thus able to reorient the economy towards achieving the SDGs, not only at the economic level, but also at the ecological and social levels. Their role is not limited to financing: they also provide technical aid and know-how. While British and American bilateral aid is based on grants, Japanese, German, and French aid is mainly made up of loans.
In the aid beneficiary countries, there are also development banks that finance projects of common interest on their territory and that play a major role in trying to reach the SDGs. Partnerships with banks active at the international level are common. The IDFC club , created in , brings together 23 national development banks and large bilateral banks including AFD in order to increase impacts.
Furthermore, at every level, non-public actors such as foundations, NGOs and businesses are playing a growing role. There are also many synergies among all these development finance actors. Local authorities also play an important role, as they can finance development projects directly or via AFD…. As both a bank that finances projects and an agency that allocates grants on behalf of the French government, AFD plays a pivotal role among all these actors.
They renewed this commitment in If possible, identify conclusions, knowledge gaps and whether opinion has changed over time. Some of the commonly cited challenges, and approaches to address them, include: Conceptual, institutional and strategic gaps: Differences in working principles, mandates and assumptions can present challenges for operationalising LRRD. Internally, the institutional arrangements of some donors present a clear division in the delivery of humanitarian and development aid.
While externally, disunity among donor agencies and a lack of dynamism to respond to events have created strategic gaps in the delivery of different forms of aid. Approaches to tackling such gaps include: decentralising planning, analysis, and funding allocation; establishing joint humanitarian and development offices; and creating operational frameworks that incorporate both a long-term perspective into humanitarian work, and issues of vulnerability and risk in development work.
Funding gaps: There is inconsistent evidence about the existence of a temporal funding gap between the humanitarian and development phases of a response. However, more comprehensive evidence of a systematic funding gap for recovery activities, and evidence that fragile state do not receive the necessary support.
0コメント